Instructions for Reviewers
The Journal of Global Biological Advances (JGBA) relies on the expertise and dedication of peer reviewers to maintain the quality, integrity, and scientific rigor of published research. We greatly value the important role reviewers play in advancing biological sciences and ensuring the reliability of scholarly communication.
ACCEPTING A REVIEW INVITATION
Before accepting a review assignment, reviewers should ensure that:
- The manuscript falls within their area of expertise.
- They can provide an objective and unbiased assessment.
- No conflicts of interest exist that may influence their evaluation.
- They can complete the review within the requested timeframe.
If a reviewer is unable to accept an invitation, they are encouraged to decline promptly so that alternative reviewers may be invited.
Reviewer Responsibilities
Reviewers are expected to:
- Provide objective, constructive, and evidence-based evaluations of submitted manuscripts.
- Assess the originality, scientific quality, methodological rigor, and significance of the research.
- Identify strengths, limitations, and areas requiring improvement.
- Maintain confidentiality throughout the review process.
- Disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest before accepting a review assignment.
- Submit review reports within 14–21 days of accepting the review invitation.
- Inform the Editorial Office promptly if additional time is required.
CONFIDENTIALITY
JGBA operates a Double-Blind Peer Review process. Reviewers must treat all manuscripts and associated materials as confidential documents.
Reviewers should not:
- Share manuscript content with unauthorized individuals.
- Discuss unpublished findings outside the review process.
- Use information obtained through peer review for personal or professional advantage.
Any request to consult a colleague should be communicated to the Editorial Office in advance.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Reviewers should decline assignments if any conflict of interest could affect their judgment. Potential conflicts may include:
- Recent collaboration with the authors.
- Employment at the same institution as the authors.
- Financial, professional, or personal relationships related to the work.
- Direct academic or commercial competition.
Any potential conflict should be disclosed to the Editorial Office immediately.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Reviewers are encouraged to assess manuscripts based on the following criteria:
Relevance and Scope
- Is the manuscript relevant to the aims and scope of JGBA?
- Does it contribute meaningfully to biological sciences and related interdisciplinary fields?
Originality and Significance
- Does the study present novel findings, concepts, methodologies, or applications?
- Is the research question scientifically important and relevant?
Scientific Quality
- Is the study design appropriate and scientifically sound?
- Are methods adequately described and reproducible?
- Are statistical analyses appropriate and correctly interpreted where applicable?
Results and Conclusions
- Are the results clearly presented and supported by the data?
- Do the conclusions accurately reflect the findings?
- Have limitations been adequately discussed?
Ethical Compliance
- Has appropriate ethical approval been obtained where required?
- Are informed consent procedures reported for studies involving human participants?
- Are animal studies conducted according to recognized ethical standards?
- Are biosafety and environmental considerations adequately addressed where relevant?
Presentation and Clarity
- Is the manuscript well organized and clearly written?
- Are figures, tables, and supplementary materials relevant and of sufficient quality?
- Are references accurate, current, and appropriate?
Reviewer Recommendations
Following evaluation, reviewers may recommend one of the following decisions:
- Accept
- Minor Revision
- Major Revision
- Reject
Reviewers should provide clear, constructive, and professional comments that support their recommendation and assist authors in improving their work.
USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)
To protect confidentiality and intellectual property, reviewers must not upload manuscript content, figures, datasets, or supplementary materials to publicly accessible generative AI platforms or services.
Reviewers remain fully responsible for the content, accuracy, and integrity of their review reports.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
JGBA follows the principles and recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Reviewers are encouraged to notify the Editorial Office of any concerns regarding:
- Plagiarism or duplicate publication.
- Data fabrication, falsification, or image manipulation.
- Ethical concerns involving human participants or animal research.
- Undisclosed conflicts of interest.
- Any other issues that may compromise research integrity.
REVIEWER RECOGNITION
JGBA highly values the contributions of peer reviewers. Reviewer efforts may be recognized through certificates, annual acknowledgments, or other recognition initiatives in accordance with journal policies while maintaining reviewer confidentiality.
CONTACT INFORMATION
For questions regarding the review process or ethical concerns, please contact:
Editorial Office: contact@scitxthub.com
We sincerely thank all reviewers for their time, expertise, and commitment to maintaining the quality, integrity, and scientific excellence of research published in the Journal of Global Biological Advances (JGBA).
